|
February 14, 2007 | |||
| |||
|
| Over the course of the past two decades, it has become increasingly, abundantly clear that companies must find ways to be more innovative, more flexible and better prepared. Yet despite a steady supply of new jargon, models and techniques, the practices by which most companies create strategy have by and large not helped firms become more prepared for the unexpected. For the development and communication of strategy to become the inspired and inspiring process it must be, it is up to company leaders to alter their strategizing practices in three crucial ways:
It is up to leaders to reinvent the components of strategy creation by engaging more of what makes people human - our imagination.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
In most developed countries, some two-thirds of the GNP is made up of services. However, strategic planning and concept development are still focused on solving problems for the manufacturing industry. The only new service industry in which strategy concept makers have shown any interest is financial services, especially banking. Big banks are an integrated part of the world of big global manufacturing industrials. Is it because of this poor state of knowledge that almost the only service company that has had any impact on general strategy formulation is the fast food chain McDonalds? The success of McDonalds is based on a simple and effective strategic formula: standardization of service into a package of the smallest detail, strict quality control and cost-effective production by young, cheap, unskilled workers supervised by managers on the shop-floor. Karl-Erik believes that "McDonaldization"
strategy is far too simple a way of looking at the dynamic and
fast changing world outside the manufacturing industries -people-intensive
and people-dependent. Karl-Erik suggests that in order to develop
truly original strategy concepts for the non-manufacturing companies
one should try to turn the traditional logic of manufacturing
"upside down". Instead of basing our conceptual thinking
on 100 year-old doctrines based on the notion of the one-product
factory, Karl-Erik suggest that we should look away from the manufacturing
industry, very far away.
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
|