Lally, R. (1997). Aligning Values with Strategies: Getting results for the Hands on Manager (Office Edition, pp. 6-9).
Identifying the specific definitions for an organization's formal values is often a fairly clean-cut task. Most companies include this information in their personnel handbook. Aligning the understanding of a company's informal values between executive management and many layers of subordinate employees can prove to be a more challenging task. So what are informal values? "You find them in questions like, "What does it take to get promoted," "What does it take to get fired"... "How late do I have to stay to be recognized as a hard-worker?" (Lally, 1997). Many of these questions can usually be answered by one's common sense. Although, it is most helpful to a company's employee body, to understand clearly all values, formal or informal. It is the manager who is usually charged with the task of communicating formal or informal values. How does this all relate to strategy? "Managers are good at creating strategies based on market conditions, but they often stop there without considering whether elements underneath the strategy--values, staff, and the rest--are aligned with it. If they aren't, the strategy fails" (Lally, 1997). The core idea is that regardless of how market conditions change, when the manager realigns his or her strategy, other organizational elements must also change. "Managers must facilitate changes in organizational structures, compensation, and the informal values so that they all line up with the strategy" (Lally, 1997). The manager should also work diplomatically with senior management in order to facilitate certain changes that require approval. Often, the manager has to entertain both the employees and senior management when working to accomplish strategy changes.
Clampitt,
P., Berk, B. and Williams, M. (2001). Leaders as Strategic Communicators:
Ivey Business Journal (2nd Edition, pp. 51-55).
Among the important traits of a great leader, being a strategic
communicator stands out as the most important. Some leaders
are naturally strategic communicators, most of us however, could
always be much better. The difference between good and great
is usually having a formula, a well thought out plan. A 2002
article, in the Ivey Business Journal, outlines four steps to
follow in order to be an effective strategic communicator. The
first step is to assess the context. "Effective leaders
assess those they seek to influence. A proper assessment allows
leaders to determine the group's limits and possibilities. Push
too slow and key initiatives never get traction. Push too fast
and they falter through sheer exhaustion" (Clampitt, Berk,
and Williams, 2002). The second step is to craft a strategy.
The leader must "select communication goals that are linked
to the organizational goals...executives generally choose one
of the five basic communication strategies:
Underscoring a theme is not enough. To be effective, executives must play an active role in translating the theme into corporate priorities and objectives at each level of the organization" (Clampitt, Berk, and Williams, 2002). The third step is a simple one, the leader's communication strategy must be clear. The most important steps of this stage are "repetition and redundancy...identify and utilize opinion leaders...select the right channels" (Clampitt, Berk, and Williams, 2002). The fourth and final step in this process is to provoke dialogue. By obtaining feedback, a leader will be able to evaluate his or her own plan and learn any additional insight that maybe useful in the future.
Galpin, T. "Connecting Culture
to Organizational Change" HR Magazine (March 1996,
p.84)
"Connecting Culture to Organizational Change" from HR Magazine clearly communicates how significantly difficult and complex it can be to accomplish this task. I extracted some ideas that seemed to effectively simplify this process. They are:
In addition to the preceding points it is essential to reward and recognize positive actions. Other important ideas include leading by example and focusing on consistent positive behavior.
Sussland. W.A. (2002). Connecting the
planners and doers. Quality Progress. Vol. 35,
Issue 6, June 2002. Retrieved April 1, 2003 from the World Wide
Web:
http://www.asq.org/pub/qualityprogress/past/0602/sussland.html.
Connecting the Planners and Doers, (2002), appearing in the
journal Quality Progress presents the Two Rings model developed
by the author, Sussland to link business strategy to its implementation.
The outer ring of the model includes the key tasks of senior
management which are to check, alert, plan and deploy (CAPD),
in that order. The inner ring includes the key tasks of line
management which are to plan, do, check and act (PDCA).
On the outer ring, check refers to reviewing the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the organization through
qualitative and quantitative measures. Alert signifies initiating
proactive changes and developing contingency plans to respond
to future trends. Plan refers to developing the strategic objectives
and allocating resources to deploy the plan. Sussman describes
deploy as linking "doing the right thing and doing it right"
(p.6).
When top-down deployment is complete, the process reverses direction.
Line management takes over and follows the inner ring processes
of planning, checking, doing and acting. The process is complete
when roles and responsibilities have been assigned, and resources
allocated. Tasks representative of PDCA include the role of
operations management to manage the actions planned, the use
of resources, processes deployed, products and services delivered
and the value chain of customers and suppliers.
Successful linking of business strategy and its implementation
results in connecting the internal and external environments,
connecting the past to the future and connecting all levels
and functions of the organization. The Two Rings model is a
systematic methodology to accomplish this linkage.
Implement Strategy
The author found hundreds of articles on grand strategies, and for the most part they all dealt with military or political issues. One would think that after two hours of searching, even someone who is poor at using search strings would have stumbled upon more business related articles. The attached article was the closest to "useful" that could be found. What caught the authors' eye was the narrative approach of putting the reader in the position of just having been promoted to an important position in a niche portion of a large company, and then asking that person to take the somewhat ethereal big picture strategies of the larger organization and apply them in some workable manner. The gist of the message was one of "marketing a process", not a "marketing process".
Resource Management
This proved to be an interesting site in that it took a flash card, or sound bit type of approach to discussing leadership characteristics, and the connections with proper employee resource management. The author especially liked the sections that contained "myth v. reality" comparisons. It could be argued that this site does not address a wide variety of resources other than personnel, but in the authors' opinion, the people are the most important resource. This site also included information on issues such as reward systems and employee empowerment. In retrospect, this site would probably be a more effective part of the tool kit if it was split up and scattered throughout the tool kit.
"How to achieve the targeted results"
(Action plans, how to get there)
"There are three kinds of companies: those that make things happen, those that watch things happen, and the rest who wonder what happened." Anonymous
A successful business is about creating value for its customers, and the intent or plan should be to create more value than the competitors. This process involves matching the firm's resources and capabilities with the opportunities and challenges of the marketplace. A successful business strategy matches the firm's strengths (resources and capabilities) with market opportunities to create a sustainable competitive advantage by providing more value for its customers than competitors.
Three ingredients are necessary for a business to successfully steer a strategic course through market turbulence and become proactive in shaping events and competitive behavior to its advantage.
THOUGHTS ABOUT STRATEGY
Superior firm performance is generally attributed to its competitive advantage. Competitive advantage arises from leveraging a firm's unique skills and resources to implement value-creating strategy that competitors cannot implement as effectively. A sustainable competitive advantage occurs when the advantage is immune or not subject to erosion by competitor's actions.
Thus, a strategy is decisions and activities that enable a firm to achieve and sustain competitive advantage and to improve its performance. It is a game plan for moving the company into an attractive business position and building a sustainable competitive advantage (Thompson, p.43).
Strategy is a directional statement that serves as a central theme guiding and coordinating integrated actions in the pursuit of competitive advantage. It is a compass, not a detailed road map (Day, p21). Strategy is both
Strategy is a guide how to pursue the company's mission and strategic vision and how to achieve it. A competitive strategy specifies how a business intends to compete in the markets it chooses to serve (Day, p5). Strategy focuses on how to achieve performance targets, how to outcompete rivals, how to achieve sustainable competitive advantage, how to strengthen the company's long-term position, how to grow the business, how to satisfy customers, how to respond to changing market conditions, (Thompson, p.10, 42). Basically the central thrust of business strategy is how to build and strengthen the company's long-term competitive position in the marketplace.
Steps to Formulate a Competitive Strategy
Simply stated, strategy is an action plan that directs a firm in developing a competitive advantage. A sustainable competitive advantage arises from leveraging a firm's core competencies to create value for the customer. For a strategy to be successful, it must be consistent with the firm's mission/vision, objectives/goals, with its internal and external environment, and target market.
A pictorial representation of this process is as follows:

Formulating a competitive strategy is based upon the steps we have done thus far: (Porter, xix-xx)
Core Competencies
Identification
Implied Assumptions
Mission
Vision
Establish Objectives
SWOT
Develop Goals
Segment/Target Market
Strategy - "How to Achieve the Targeted Results"
With these steps completed, we are now able to formulate a strategy to provide direction to the company.
A company's strategy should be market-driven and customer-driven using outside-in strategic thinking aimed at boosting customer satisfaction and achieving sustainable competitive advantage. The company must study market trends, listen to customers, enhance the company's competitiveness, and steer the company in whatever new directions are dictated by market conditions and customer preferences. (revised Thompson, p.10)
A corporate planning director of a Fortune 500 MNC observes that "the process of strategic marketing is coming to be defined as the management of competitive advantage - that is, as process of identifying, developing, and taking advantage of opportunities that result in a tangible business advantage." Meeting these challenges requires developing market-driven strategies. The process involves becoming market-oriented, matching customer value opportunities with organization's distinctive capabilities, and developing internal and external strategic relationships. The basic initiative for guiding market-driven strategy begins by developing a market-oriented culture and processes in the organization" (Excerpt from: "Competitive Advantage in the Global Marketplace: a Focus on Marketing Strategy," by Thomas Hult, David Cravens, and Jagdish Sheth; Journal of Business Research, v51, 2001.)
Formulating a business strategy that yields sustainable competitive advantage requires some of the following actions: (Thompson p.11,48-49).
Representative Strategies
A company's competitive strategy consists of its business approaches and initiatives to attract customers and fulfill their expectations, to withstand competitive pressures, and to strengthen its market position (Thompson, p.135). Having identified and evaluated its major competitors, the company must design broad competitive marketing strategies by which it can gain competitive advantage by offering superior customer value. Competitive strategies have been classified to define marketing strategy in terms of a single-minded pursuit of delivering superior value to customers.
An competitive advantage typically is based on:
Examples of competitive advantages for:
Each company must determine which strategy makes the most sense given its position in the industry, its objectives, opportunities, and resources (Kotler, p.685) Companies that pursue a clear strategy are likely to perform well. The firm that carries out that strategy best will make the most profits. Firms that do not pursue a clear strategy - "Middle-of-the-roaders" or stuck in the middle and do the worst (Kotler, p.686)
Generic Competitive Strategies
A generic business strategy classifies business strategies and approaches toward obtaining a sustainable competitive advantage into groups with a common thrust. There are a host of strategic thrust available. Being innovative, global, entrepreneurial, information technology based, or manufacturing could drive a strategy.
The basic differences among competitive strategies are:

The following are the most basic strategies. We will be choosing one of these for each of your segment/target markets.
Overall Low Cost Leadership Strategy
This strategy focuses on appealing
to a broad spectrum of customers based on being the overall
low-cost provider of a product or service. Overall low cost
does not refer solely to price. It refers to the delivered cost
to the customer. The company works to achieve the lowest costs
of production and distribution so that it can price lower than
its competitors and win a large market share (Kotler,
p.686).
This strategy is aimed at achieving low-cost leadership industrywide. It is based on achieving a sustainable cost advantage in some important element of the product or service (Aaker, p.7). A low-cost provider is a powerful competitive approach in markets where many buyers are price sensitive. A low-cost leader's basis for competitive advantage is lower overall costs than competitors. Successful low-cost leaders are exceptionally good at finding ways to drive costs out of their business (Thompson, p. 135, 136). Ex. Dollar Tree Store, Walmart, Dell Computer
A low-cost leader has two options for achieving superior profit performance:
The overall cost leadership position can be achieved through a high market share or through other advantages, such as favorable access to raw materials or state-of-the-art manufacturing equipment (Aaker, p.7). To achieve a cost advantage, a firm's cumulative costs across its value chain must be lower than competitors' cumulative costs. Keys to success in achieving low-cost leadership is to be proactive in restructuring the value chain, finding innovative ways to restructure processes and tasks, cut out frills, and provide the basics more economically (Thompson, p. 138, 145). A low cost strategy need not always be associated with low prices, because lower cost could lead to enhanced profits or increased advertising or promotion instead of reduced price (Aaker, p.7).
The more price sensitive buyers are and the more inclined they are to base their purchasing decision on which seller offers the best price, the more appealing a low-cost strategy becomes. A low-cost provider's product offering must always contain enough attributes to be attractive to prospective buyers. A low-cost leadership strategy works best when:
Implementing:
Implementing overall low cost leadership strategy require different resources and skills. It also implies differing organizational arrangements, control procedures, and inventive systems. Some common implications are as follows: (Porter, p.40)

Defenses Against Five Competitive
Forces: (Porter, p.36,
37)
The low-cost position protects the
firm against all five competitive forces because bargaining
can only continue to erode profits until those of the next most
efficient competitor are eliminated.

Risks: (Porter,
p.45)
Cost leadership imposes severe burdens
on the firm to keep up its position, which means reinvesting
in modern equipment, ruthlessly scrapping obsolete assets, avoiding
product line proliferation and being alert for technological
improvement. Some of these risks are:
Differentiation Strategy
This strategy concentrates on creating a highly differentiated product/service line and marketing program so that it is perceived to a broad spectrum of customers as being unique. The company focuses on superior performance by targeting an important customer benefit valued by a segment of market. Most customers would prefer to this product/service line if its price is not too high (Kotler, p.686). Ex. Victoria Secret, Marriott, IBM
A differentiation strategy is one in which the product offering is differentiated from the competition by providing value to the customer by product quality, perhaps by enhancing the performance, quality, prestige, features, service backup, reliability, or convenience of the product (Aaker, p.6,7). It seeks to differentiate the company's product/service offering from rivals' in ways that will appeal to buyers. (Thompson, p. 135).
Sustainable differentiation usually has to be linked to unique internal skills, core competencies, and capabilities. As a rule, differentiation yields a long-lasting and more profitable competitive edge when it is based on new product innovation, technical superiority, product quality and reliability, and comprehensive customer service. Such attributes are widely perceived by buyers as having value (Thompson, p. 148)
The competitive advantage for a differentiation strategy is either a product/service offering whose attributes differ significantly from the offerings of rivals or a set of capabilities for delivering customer value. Successful differentiation strategy begins with a deep understanding of what customers need and ends with building organizational capabilities to satisfy these needs better than rivals (Thompson, p.149-151)
Differentiation strategies work best in markets where: (Thompson, p.152)
Implementing
Implementing differentiation strategy require different resources and skills. It also implies differing organizational arrangements, control procedures, and inventive systems. Some common implications are as follows: (Porter, p.41)

Defenses Against Five Competitive
Forces: (Thompson, p.151,
152)
Differentiation results in enhanced
buyer loyalty to a company's brand or model and greater willingness
to pay more for it. It creates a defensible position for coping
with the five competitive forces.

Risks: (Porter, p.46) (Thompson, p. 152)
Differentiation also involves a series of risks:
Focused Strategy
This strategy concentrates on a narrow market segment by offering niche customers a customized product or service that meets their tastes and requirements better than rivals' offerings. The company focuses on targeting an important customer benefit valued by a narrow segment of the market (could be a particular buyer group, segment of the product line, or geographic market). It concentrates its effort on serving a few market segments well rather than going after the whole market (Kotler, p.686). The entire focus strategy is built around serving a particular target very well. Ex. microbreweries, local bakeries, bed-and-breakfast inns, boutiques
A focuser's basis for competitive advantage is either
This strategy works best when: (Thompson, p.156)
Defenses Against Five Competitive Forces: (Thompson, p.155,156)
A focuser's specialized competencies and capabilities in serving the target market niche provide a basis for defending against the five competitive forces.

Risks: (Porter, p.46) (Thompson, p. 156)
Focus involves yet another set of risks:
Stuck in the Middle Strategy
This is a losing strategy.
Firms that do not pursue a clear strategy , called middle-of-the-roaders,
do the worst. Do not be stuck in the "middle" trying
to be successful at all three disciplines, because your firm
will generally end up not being good at any one. Business that
do not stand out as the lowest in cost, highest in perceived
value, or best in serving some market segment encounter difficulties.
Ex. Sears, Holiday Inn
(Kotler, p.686)
Market-Based Generic Strategies
These are similar to Porter's competitive
two strategies, but market-based in their development. Market
strategy has two fundamental objectives:
It is believed that companies gain leadership position by delivering superior value to their customers. Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema, in their book the Discipline of Market Leaders, 1995, suggest three generic market strategies - Product leadership, customer intimacy, and operational excellence (Slater, p.37). Companies can pursue any one of the market-based strategies for delivering superior customer value. Few firms can be the best at more than one of these disciplines. Leading companies focus on and excel at a single market-based generic strategy, while meeting industry standards on the other two. (Kotler, p.686, 287). Their success depends more on how well each is executed and less on the market environment of the business. The following is an explanation of the market-based strategies:
Operational Excellence
This strategy focuses on appealing to a broad spectrum of customers based on being the overall low-cost provider of a product or service because of the firm's focus on efficiency. The company provides superior value to their customers by offering them lowest total cost. It works to reduce costs and to create a lean and efficient value-delivery system. It serves customers who want reliable, good-quality products or services, but who want them cheaply and easily. (Kotler, p.686). Ex. Wal-Mart, Southwest Airlines, Dell Computer, and McDonalds.
Two operating characteristics common to these businesses are:
Customer Intimacy
This strategy concentrates on a narrow market segment by a deep understanding of its customer and his perception of the value of the product or service offered. The company provides superior value by precisely segmenting its markets and then tailoring its products or services to match exactly the needs of targeted customers. It specializes in satisfying unique customer needs through a close relationship with and intimate knowledge of the customers. It builds detailed customer databases for segmenting and targeting, and empowers its marketing people to respond quickly to customer needs. It serves customers who are willing to pay a premium for a service, or special attention they receive (Kotler, p.686). Ex. Amazon, Land's End
Customer intimate business focuses on understanding the customer and his perception of the value of the product or service offered. Accompanying this orientation is a focus on the lifetime value of a relationship. It costs only about one-fifth as much to make an additional sale to an existing customer as it does to attract and sell to a new one. Thus the concepts of "customer equity" and "customer share" instead of market share are central to the customer intimacy business (Slater, p.38)
Product Leadership - This strategy concentrates on creating an innovative product/service line and marketing program so that it is perceived to a broad spectrum of customers as being leading-edge products or services. They provide superior value by offering its customers a continuous stream of state-of-the-art products or services. The company seeks to identify emerging opportunities and continuously strive to develop and deliver new products. They look for first mover advantages. It is open to new ideas, relentlessly pursues new solutions, and works to reduce cycle times so that it can get new products to market quickly (Slater, p.38, Kotler, p.686). Ex. Sony, Microsoft, and Nike
They key task for product leaders if to maintain an environment in which focused creativity can flourish. It requires a culture that encourages experimentation and risk-taking, one in which wee-developed plans that fail are often celebrated rather than punished. Product leaders usually work in multifunctional teams to shorten response times and development cycles. They recognize the importance of developing platform technologies and products that become the foundation for future products (Slater, p.39).
The following are the most basic strategies. We will be choosing one of these for each of your segment/target markets.
Cost:
Cost Leadership Strategy - (Operational)
This strategy focuses on appealing
to a broad spectrum of customers based on being the overall
low-cost provider of a product or service. Overall low cost
does not refer solely to price. It refers to the delivered cost
to the customer.
The company works to achieve the lowest costs of production
and distribution so that it can
price lower than its competitors and win a large market share.
Operational Excellence - (Market Focused)
This strategy focuses on appealing to a broad spectrum of customers based on being the overall low-cost provider of a product or service because of the firm's focus on efficiency. The company provides superior value to their customers by offering them lowest total cost. It works to reduce costs and to create a lean and efficient value-delivery system. It serves customers who want reliable, good-quality products or services, but who want them cheaply and easily.
Product/Service:
Differentiation Strategy - (Operational)
This strategy concentrates on creating a highly differentiated product or service line and marketing program so that it is perceived to a broad spectrum of customers as being unique. The company focuses on superior performance by targeting an important customer benefit valued by a segment of market. Most customers would prefer to this product/service line if its price is not too high.
Product Leadership - (Market Focused)
This strategy concentrates on creating an innovative product/service line and marketing program so that it is perceived to a broad spectrum of customers as being leading-edge products or services. They provide superior value by offering its customers a continuous stream of state-of-the-art products or services. The company seeks to identify emerging opportunities and continuously strive to develop and deliver new products.
Customer:
Focused Strategy - (Operational)
This strategy concentrates on a narrow market segment by offering niche customers a customized product or service that meets their tastes and requirements better than rivals' offerings. The company focuses on targeting an important customer benefit valued by a narrow segment of the market (buyer group, segment of the product line, or geographic market). The entire focus strategy is built around serving a particular target very well.
Customer Intimacy - (Market Focused)
This strategy concentrates on a narrow market segment by a deep understanding of its customer and his perception of the value of the product or service offered. The company provides superior value by tailoring its products or services to match exactly the needs of targeted customers. It specializes in satisfying unique customer needs through an intimate knowledge of the customers. It builds detailed customer databases for segmenting and targeting, and empowers its marketing people to respond quickly to customer needs.
CRITERIA:
Now that you have a strategy for each customer group, make sure it is a winning strategy for your company. A winning strategy must build a competitive advantage that can become sustainable, fits the enterprise's situation, and improves company performance. The following criteria are to be used as thought proving questions. It is not necessary for your strategy to meet all these criteria. However, they are presented for your consideration.

Tests of a Winning Strategy
A winning strategy must build sustainable competitive advantage, fit the enterprise's situation, and improve company performance. Tests can be used to evaluate the merits of one strategy over another and to gauge how good a strategy is. The soundness of a competitive strategy depends on how well it can satisfy the following tests: (Thompson, p.62 and Day, p.35-37, 41)
Sustainable Competitive Advantage Test
A good strategy leads to sustainable competitive advantage. The bigger the competitive edge that a strategy helps build, the more powerful and effective it is.
The Goodness of Fit Test
A good strategy is tailored to fit the company's internal and external situation. Without tight situational fit, there's real question whether a strategy appropriately matches the requirement for market success.
Performance Test
A good strategy boosts company performance.
Competitive Advantages Do Diminish (Source Day, page 206-)
Most advantages are contestable as sustainability is only a matter degree. Consider a Price Advantage. It is only a matter of time before a competitor can easily counter the price because it becomes known to the marketplace. Due to reverse-engineering abilities, most product innovation is quickly contested. As such, a couple of mechanisms are at work in most markets to undermine the leader; however these factors can also benefit competitors seeking to attack.
The following are situations when basically no competitive advantage is secure:
However, there can be some redemption in developing invisible assets. These generally exist in the superior skills of personnel, the training or information they acquired, and their commitment to the organization. Another is a unique corporate culture (such as a customer orientation) and committed employees. Other invisible assets can exist outside the firm in a well-established brand name, exclusive sources of raw material, or in reliable channel relationships. The distinguishing features of invisible assets are:
Strategic Identification (Aakers, p.6, 28-31)
The identification of strategic alternatives is based on the determination of:
Product Market Investment Strategy
The Product-market scope is defined by…
Growth directions
In the following product-market matrix, four growth options are shown.

Investment strategies
For each product market four investment options are possible:
Functional Area Strategies
The development of a business strategy involves coordination of various function area:
The strategic assets
or competencies that underlie the strategy and provide the
sustainable competitive advantage.
Strategy formulation must consider the cost and feasibility
of generating or maintaining asset or competencies that will
provide the basis for a sustainable competitive advantage.
Strategic Positioning
Strategic positioning specifies how the business is to be perceived relative to its competitors and market by its customers and employees/partners. It represents the essence of a business strategy (Aakers). Positioning is the way the product/service is defined by consumers on important attributes. The place the product/service occupies in the consumer's mind in relation to its competitors. (K&A, p.269)
Criteria For Strategy Selection (Aaker, p.30)
Competitive Strategies - Based on Competitive Positions
There are different competitive strategies based on the different competitive position the firm plays in the target market. Based upon the company's competitive position, there are specific marketing strategies. The following are strategies for market leaders, challengers, followers, and nichers: (Kotler, 687-689 and Thompson, p.200-207)
Strategy for Market Leader
The firm in an industry with the largest market share. It usually leads another firms in price changes, new product introductions, distribution coverage, and promotion spending.
Market Challenger
A runner-up firm in an industry that is fighting hard to increase its market share.
Market Follower
A runner-up firm in an industry that wants to hold its share without rocking the boat.
Market Nicher
A firm in an industry that serves small segments that other firms overlook or ignore. The firm knows the target customer group so well that it meets their needs better than other firms that casually sell to this niche. The nicher can charge a substantial markup over costs because of the added value. An ideal market niche is big enough to be profitable and has growth potential.
Additional Competitive Strategies
First-Mover Strategies/ Preemptive Strategy - (Thompson, p.170) - A preemptive strategic move is the pioneering implementation of a strategy into a business area that, because it is first, generates an asset or competency that forms the basis of an sustainable competitive advantage. For a preemptive move to create "first-mover advantages," competitors must be inhibited pr prevented from duplicating or countering it (Aaker, p.7).
Synergy Strategy - (Aaker, p.8) Synergy strategy occurs when a business has an advantage because it is linked to another business within the same firm or division. The two businesses, may be able to share a sales force, office, or warehouse and thus reduce costs or investment. They may be able to jointly offer a customer a combination of coordinating products.
Tactical Issues and Program Formulation
Studies have shown that a 5% increase in customer loyalty can produce profit increases up to 85%. (Peppers & Rogers Group Newsletter - Oct. 2, 2002)
"Marketing is the process of planning and executing the conception, pricing, promotion, and distribution of ideas, goods, and services to create exchanges that satisfy individual and organizational objectives." (American Marketing Association, 1985) This is not based on customer actions, but firm actions.
Connecting with Customers through Segmenting, Targeting, and Positioning
Probably a critical aspect for marketers in future will be to focus on Niches.
Develop the Positioning
through Marketing Mix or 4 Ps
The Marketing Mix (4 Ps) is a
set of marketing tools/tactics that the firm uses to pursue
its objectives.
Tactics are the specific actions that lead to implementing your strategies. The tactics are broken down in to four areas (product, price, promotion, distribution) and will provide the framework for creating action items to accomplish your strategic market objectives of reaching your target market. Together, they are a set of tools that the firm blends to produce a response it wants in the target market. There are different tactical positions for each functional area based on the selected strategy. The tactical positions reinforce your strategy.
From a product-focused approach, the four areas are defined as:
From a customer-focused approach, the four areas are defined as:
Product
What is a product? A product is anything that can be brought to the market, which will provide satisfaction. A product is more than just a physical object, which is why we refer to a product as an offering. It includes physical objects, services, events, persons, places, organizations, ideas, and any combination of these.
Are you offering a product or a service?

What is your customer "really buying" when he/she acquires your product?

Considerations for product/service
identification
Why do consumers buy products/services?
Product life-cycle strategies
Product life-cycle - estimation
of a product's revenues and profits over the course of its
life. This is another "tool" to assist a marketer
in product/service strategies. Provides a perspective to understand
the aspects of the product. The five stages are:
Pricing
Why is price important?
Price is one of the major factors affecting buyer choice and
needs to be cohesive with the strategy you picked. Price is
the only element of the four tactics that produces revenues
as the other areas represent cost areas. Common pricing mistakes
include:
Considerations for Pricing
Decisions
There are both internal and external
factors to consider when setting prices.
Internal factors include
External factors include
Prices need to be set somewhere between product costs and market demand.
Pricing Strategies/Plans
There are three ways to look at pricing decisions 1) costs,
2) value, 3) competition.

Promotion
Customers do not distinguish between messages sources about a company and its products, thus the necessity to manage the total promotional program and ensure it is sending a unified consistent message. This idea is called "integrated marketing communications."
Definition: Concept for carefully integrating and coordinating a company's many communication channels to deliver a clear, consistent and compelling message.
Considerations
for Promotional Decisions
To deliver the message, a mix of the following well-known
communication tools are used:
Advertising - Any paid form of nonpersonal presentation and promotion of ideas, goods or services through print and broadcast ads, packaging outer and inserts, motion pictures, brochures, booklets, posters, leaflets, directories, billboards, display signs, pop displays.
Direct Marketing - Use of mail and telephone to communicate with or solicit a response from customers by using catalogs, mailings, telemarketing, electronic shopping, TV shopping
Sales Promotion - Short-term incentives to encourage trial or purchase of a product or service through contests, games, premiums, samplings, trade shows, exhibits, demonstrations, coupons, rebates, low-interest financing, trade-in allowances, stamps
Public Relations - A variety of programs designed to promote and/or protect a company's image or its individual products through the use of press kits, speeches, seminars, annual reports, charitable donation, sponsorships, publications, community relations, lobbying events.
Personal Selling - Face-to-face interaction with one or more prospective purchasers for the purpose of making sales by using sales presentations, sales meetings, incentive programs, samples, fairs and trade shows.

Here are the six steps using the above tools to creating an effective communication plan.
Step One - Identify the target audience. In this plan you determined the customer segments, which are your target audience.
Step Two - Determine the communication goals. Your strategic market goals have been identified, but you may consider adding a goal here that directly relates to this communications plan and segment.
Step Three - Design the message. A good message gets a customer's attention, holds interest, arouses desire, and obtains action. A message must have content, structure, and a format.
Step Four - Select the communication tools, as listed above.
Step Five - Identify the message source. How is the message being communicated and is the source credible for the message being delivered?
Step Six - Evaluate the results. Did the message have the intended impact on the target audience? Measure the behavior of the target audience.
Promotion Strategies/Plans
There are two basic promotion
strategies/plans:

Distribution/Place
Distribution channels are ways and the process of making a product or service available to the customer. For many years, distribution was not given much priority within company strategies. However, in the past decade distribution decisions have risen in importance because channel activities impact all other marketing and promotional activities. Companies or people in your distribution channels in many instances provide greater efficiency in making goods and services available to your target markets because of contacts, experience, specialization, and scale of operation.
Considerations for Distribution Decisions
Companies and people in your marketing channel perform many key functions. Some help to complete transactions through:
Information - Gathering and distributing market research and intelligence information about forces in the marketing environment needed for planning and aiding exchange.
Promotion - Developing and spreading persuasive communications about an offer or your company.
Contact - Finding and communicating with your customers.
Negotiation - Reaching an agreement on price and/or other terms of the offer so that ownership or possession can be transferred.
Physical distribution - Transporting and storing goods
Financing - Acquiring and using funds to cover the costs of the distribution

Structure follows
strategy.
Alfred Chandler, Jr.
Those that implement
the plans must make the plans.
Patrick Hagerty, Texas Instruments
A strategic plan will provide a business with the roadmap it needs to pursue a specific strategic direction and set of performance objectives. However, this is just a plan; it does not guarantee that the desired performance objectives will be reached any more than having a roadmap guarantees the traveler will arrive at the desired destination (Best, p.325).
The real strategy in strategic planning rests with turning your tactic into a strategy for your company. Doing this requires effective implementation. Implementation is the process that turns strategies and plans into actions in order to accomplish strategic objectives. Implementation involves activities that effectively put the plan to work. Whereas the strategic plan addresses the what and why of activities, implementation addresses the who, where, when, and how. Implementation of the tactic drives the strategy of the company (Kotler, p.71 and Best, p.325).
While the strategy itself is important, the ability to execute it is the only thing that counts. Strategy is a word that is thrown around liberally in most organizations. Task forces are formed, consultants are hired, and extensive plans are written. Yet, still 90% of organizations are unable to implement what they have spent so much time, effort, and money for planning. According to a cover story in Fortune magazine, nine out of ten organizations fail to do so due to the fact that: (Kaplan & Norton promotional brochures)
To achieve business goals and objectives, a business needs not only a good strategic plan, but also a well-executed implementation of the plan (Best, p.325). It is believed that implementation is as important, or even more important, than strategy. The fact is that both are critical to success. Actually, companies can gain competitive advantage through implementation if done effectively (Kotler, p.71). There are three major forces that contribute to the successful implementation of a strategic plan: Owning the Plan, Supporting the Plan and Adapting the Plan (Best, p.325).
Owning the Plan
The most common reason a plan fails is lack of ownership. If people do not have an ownership stake and responsibility in the plan, it will be business as usual for all but as frustrated few. Ownership of a plan can be enhanced with detailed action plans, a champion and ownership team, compensation based on performance metrics, and top management involvement (Best, p.326).
Detailed Action Plan
The development and use of a detailed action plan may be the single most effective practice in determining the success of a strategic plan. A detailed action plan involves each aspect of the strategy, but in greater detail with respect to specific actions that have to occur for the plan to be implemented. As shown in the example below, for each action items specified, an individual is assigned a specific responsibility, a measure or goal is delineated, and a time frame within which the action item should be completed is agreed upon. In this way individuals have ownership, understand their roles and responsibilities, and are accountable for implementing a portion of the significant elements of the strategic p
